Relatório preliminar do estudo de avaliação de uso de máscaras no âmbito da prevenção da COVID-19 em lugares públicos - O caso da Cidade de Maputo / reliminary report of the study to evaluate the use of masks as part of the prevention of COVID-19 in public places - The case of Maputo City

As máscaras faciais são efectivas para prevenção de infecções respiratórias. O uso destas durante epidemias ou surtos de doenças virais de vias respiratórias constitui uma medida eficaz para prevenção da disseminação do vírus. Com objectivo de avaliar o nível de cumprimento das medidas de prevenção da COVID-19, a luz do decreto presidencial 12/2020, O INS realizou o presente estudo com o propósito de analisar até que ponto as pessoas estão usando máscaras apropriadas e correctamente e, se sabem da importância do uso das mesmas. Trata-se de um estudo observacional quanti-qualitativo, que decorreu no período de 26 de Abril a 03 de Junho de 2020, em alguns supermercados, mercados e paragens de transporte de passageiros na cidade de Maputo. A amostragem foi por conveniência e a duração das observações por cada local selecionado foi de duas horas. Para além das observações, foram também realizadas algumas entrevistas em profundidade com objectivo de avaliar aspectos ligados a conhecimentos, atitudes e práticas sobre o uso de máscaras no âmbito da prevenção da COVID- 19. Durante os primeiros dois dias do estudo, foram observados um total de 4,150 indivíduos dos quais quase metade (48.9%) foram observados nos mercados. Dos indivíduos observados, mais da metade (55.4%) eram adultos e na sua maioria de sexo masculino (50.6%). Do total destes indivíduos observados, mais de três quartos (90.2%) usavam algum tipo de máscara como meio de prevenção da COVID-19, apesar de cerca de um em cada dez indivíduo observado (27.5%) não apresentarem-se com as máscaras correctamente usadas. Em ralação ao tipo de máscaras, a maioria dos indivíduos observados usavam máscaras de fábrico caseiro (85.3%) seguido de máscaras cirurgicas (8.2%). Os resultados do estudo mostram que quase todos os indivíduos que se fazem aos mercados e supermercados e paragens de transporte de passageiros, tem conhecimento da utilidade e importância do uso da máscara na prevenção da COVID-19. Contudo muitos o usam por causa da obrigatoriedade exigida em locais públicos de grandes aglomerados. Persistem ainda casos de indivíduos que não usam correctamente as máscaras, alegando que o uso da máscara causa alergia ou sensassão de asfixia, principalmente para pessoas com problemas de índole respiratória. O estudo mostra qua há necessidade de maior difusão de forma didáctica e pedagógica do uso de máscaras, responsabilização de algumas estruturas governativas na fiscalização do cumprimento das normas de prevenção da COVID-19 e disponibilidade de mais espaços de antena nos órgãos de comunicação social, para mais divulgação de informação sobre mecanismos de prevenção da COVID-19.

Do Italian people still wear masks? Analysis of personality and dispositional correlates of facemask use in post Covid-19 scenario.

Face mask wearing is a low-cost preventative measure for the Covid-19 pandemic. In Italy, face masks are no longer mandatory indoors from the 1st of May 2022. Some research focused on factors that influence the choice of using masks, but less is known about mask-wearing when non-mandatory. The present study aims to compare those who were still wearing masks indoors when non-mandatory and those who were not, in personality traits, anxiety, depression, and trust in healthcare professions, in Italy, in 2022. Furthermore, we analyze if resilience, reactance, political orientation, and Covid-19 vaccinations moderate between negative affectivity and the choice of wearing masks. 1151 adults, aged 18-64, were recruited. Using the Qualtrics platform, participants filled in a socio-demographic interview, and self-report questionnaires. Results showed that people who were still wearing a mask indoors had higher levels of psychoticism and negative affectivity, worse mental health, greater trust in healthcare professions, and worries about the pandemic. Moreover, resilience partially moderates the relationship between negative affectivity and the choice of wearing a mask. These findings provide a better understanding of individuals' responses to post-pandemic changes, identifying the personal and contextual aspects that can make people struggle with the process of returning to normality.

Rural and urban residents' attitudes and preferences toward COVID-19 prevention behaviors in a midwestern community.

Rural populations are more vulnerable to the impacts of COVID-19 compared to their urban counterparts as they are more likely to be older, uninsured, to have more underlying medical conditions, and live further from medical care facilities. We engaged the Southeastern MN (SEMN) community (N = 7,781, 51% rural) to conduct a survey of motivators and barriers to masking to prevent COVID-19. We also assessed preferences for types of and modalities to receive education/intervention, exploring both individual and environmental factors primarily consistent with Social Cognitive Theory. Our results indicated rural compared to urban residents performed fewer COVID-19 prevention behaviors (e.g. 62% rural vs. 77% urban residents reported wearing a mask all of the time in public, p<0.001), had more negative outcome expectations for wearing a mask (e.g. 50% rural vs. 66% urban residents thought wearing a mask would help businesses stay open, p<0.001), more concerns about wearing a mask (e.g. 23% rural vs. 14% urban were very concerned about being 'too hot', p<0.001) and lower levels of self-efficacy for masking (e.g. 13.9±3.4 vs. 14.9±2.8, p<0.001). It appears that masking has not become a social norm in rural SEMN, with almost 50% (vs. 24% in urban residents) disagreeing with the expectation 'others in my community will wear a mask to stop the spread of Coronavirus'. Except for people (both rural and urban) who reported not being at all willing to wear a mask (7%), all others expressed interest in future education/interventions to help reduce masking barriers that utilized email and social media for delivery. Creative public health messaging consistent with SCT tailored to rural culture and norms is needed, using emails and social media with pictures and videos from role models they trust, and emphasizing education about when masks are necessary.

[Effect of fraction of inspired oxygen baseline level on the mask ventilation time before intubation in emergency patients by monitoring of expiratory oxygen concentration].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) baseline levels before endotracheal intubation on the time of expiratory oxygen concentration (EtO2) reaching the standard in emergency patients with the EtO2 as the monitoring index. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted. The clinical data of patients receiving endotracheal intubation in the emergency department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1 to November 1 in 2021 were enrolled. In order to avoid interference with the final result due to inadequate ventilation caused by non-standard operation or air leakage, the process of the continuous mechanical ventilation after FiO2 was adjusted to pure oxygen in patients who had been intubated was selected to simulate the process of mask ventilation under pure oxygen before intubation. Combined with the electronic medical record and the ventilator record, the changes of the time required to reach 0.90 of EtO2 (that was, the time required to reach the standard of EtO2) and the respiratory cycle required to reach the standard after adjusting FiO2 to pure oxygen under different baseline levels of FiO2 were analyzed. RESULTS: 113 EtO2 assay records were collected from 42 patients. Among them, 2 patients had only one EtO2 record due to the FiO2 baseline level of 0.80, while the rest had two or more records of EtO2 reaching time and respiratory cycle corresponding to different FiO2 baseline level. Among the 42 patients, most of them were male (59.5%), elderly [median age was 62 (40, 70) years old] patients with respiratory diseases (40.5%). There were significant differences in lung function among different patients, but the majority of patients with normal function [oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) > 300 mmHg (1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa), 38.0%]. In the setting of ventilator parameters, combined with the slightly lower arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide of patients [33 (28, 37) mmHg], mild hyperventilation phenomenon was considered to be widespread. With the increased in FiO2 baseline level, the time of EtO2 reaching standard and the number of respiratory cycles showed a gradually decreasing trend. When the FiO2 baseline level was 0.35, the time of EtO2 reaching the standard was the longest [79 (52, 87) s], and the corresponding median respiratory cycle was 22 (16, 26) cycles. When the FiO2 baseline level was increased from 0.35 to 0.80, the median time of EtO2 reaching the standard was shortened from 79 (52, 78) s to 30 (21, 44) s, and the median respiratory cycle was also reduced from 22 (16, 26) cycles to 10 (8, 13) cycles, with statistically significant differences (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The higher the FiO2 baseline level of the mask ventilation in front of the endotracheal intubation in emergency patients, the shorter the time for EtO2 reaching the standard, and the shorter the mask ventilation time.

Conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y uso correcto de mascarilla en trabajadores de una universidad de Perú durante la pandemia: estudio transversal / Knowledge about COVID-19 and correct mask use in workers at a Peruvian university during the pandemic

Introducción: La pandemia por la COVID-19 llevó al uso masivo de equipos de protección individual (EPI). Sin embargo, la evidencia sobre la frecuencia de su uso adecuado es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y medidas de bioseguridad, y la frecuencia de uso correcto de mascarilla en los trabajadores de una universidad en Lima, Perú, durante la pandemia.Métodos: Estudio transversal realizado en los 109 trabajadores de una universidad privada que se encontraban en modalidad presencial entre junio y septiembre 2021. Se utilizó un cuestionario estructurado. Se estimaron las prevalencias del nivel de conocimiento y uso correcto de EPIs, y los factores asociados mediante la T student y Chi-2 de Pearson. Resultados: Participaron en total 82 trabajadores (75%). El 35% mostró un adecuado nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y medidas de bioseguridad. Los más jóvenes y los que se lavaban las manos en el trabajo mostraron un mayor conocimiento, refiriendo el 90% utilizar correctamente su mascarilla. Los trabajadores de áreas de servicios generales o con bajo nivel de educación refirieron un menor uso correcto de su mascarilla. Conclusión: El nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y las medidas de bioseguridad entre los trabajadores de una universidad privada fue bajo y el nivel de educación se mostró inversamente asociado al uso correcto de mascarilla. Es necesario implementar programas de capacitación por áreas de trabajo para mejorar las prácticas de bioseguridad en los trabajadores. (AU)

ntroduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to massive use of personal protective equipment (PPE). However, evidence on the frequency of appropriate use is sparse. In this study, we evaluated the level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures, and the frequen-cy of correct use of masks in workers at a university in Lima, Peru.Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in a population of 109 workers of a private uni-versity who were physically onsite. We used a structured questionnaire to measure knowl-edge of COVID-19, together with use of and training in PPE. In addition, we explored fac-tors associated with the correct use of masks and an adequate level of knowledge about COVID-19 and related biosafety measures. Results were expressed as prevalence, using student’s T-test and Pearson chi-square tests.Results: We evaluated 82 workers, 35.4% of whom showed an adequate level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures. Younger participants and those who regularly washed their hands at work had an adequate level of knowledge, with 90.2% of these re-porting correct use of their masks. Workers in general service areas or with a low level of education reported less frequent correct use of their mask compared to those who did not have these characteristics. Conclusion: We found a low level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures among the workers of a private university; a higher level of education was associated with a greater prevalence of correct mask use. Training programs by work areas are needed, to improve biosafety practices among workers. (AU)

Lifting Universal Masking in Schools - Covid-19 Incidence among Students and Staff.

BACKGROUND: In February 2022, Massachusetts rescinded a statewide universal masking policy in public schools, and many Massachusetts school districts lifted masking requirements during the subsequent weeks. In the greater Boston area, only two school districts - the Boston and neighboring Chelsea districts - sustained masking requirements through June 2022. The staggered lifting of masking requirements provided an opportunity to examine the effect of universal masking policies on the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) in schools. METHODS: We used a difference-in-differences analysis for staggered policy implementation to compare the incidence of Covid-19 among students and staff in school districts in the greater Boston area that lifted masking requirements with the incidence in districts that sustained masking requirements during the 2021-2022 school year. Characteristics of the school districts were also compared. RESULTS: Before the statewide masking policy was rescinded, trends in the incidence of Covid-19 were similar across school districts. During the 15 weeks after the statewide masking policy was rescinded, the lifting of masking requirements was associated with an additional 44.9 cases per 1000 students and staff (95% confidence interval, 32.6 to 57.1), which corresponded to an estimated 11,901 cases and to 29.4% of the cases in all districts during that time. Districts that chose to sustain masking requirements longer tended to have school buildings that were older and in worse condition and to have more students per classroom than districts that chose to lift masking requirements earlier. In addition, these districts had higher percentages of low-income students, students with disabilities, and students who were English-language learners, as well as higher percentages of Black and Latinx students and staff. Our results support universal masking as an important strategy for reducing Covid-19 incidence in schools and loss of in-person school days. As such, we believe that universal masking may be especially useful for mitigating effects of structural racism in schools, including potential deepening of educational inequities. CONCLUSIONS: Among school districts in the greater Boston area, the lifting of masking requirements was associated with an additional 44.9 Covid-19 cases per 1000 students and staff during the 15 weeks after the statewide masking policy was rescinded.

Dos males o menor: representações de universitários sobre o uso das máscaras para prevenção da Covid-19 / The lesser evil: university students representations on the use of masks for Covid-19 prevention / El mal menor: representaciones de universitarios sobre el uso de máscaras para la prevención del Covid-19

Objetivo: conhecer as representações sociais de universitários brasileiros sobre o uso de máscaras para o controle da COVID-19. Método: estudo qualitativo, tipo survey, ancorado na Teoria das Representações Sociais. Participaram 283 universitários brasileiros, selecionados por conveniência. Os dados foram coletados por meio de formulário digital. Para análise, utilizou-se a Análise Temática. Resultados: elaborou-se um tema nomeado "A máscara para prevenção: materialização do medo de contágio", e três subtemas, intitulados respectivamente "A construção de um novo hábito: o mal necessário das máscaras"; "O macrossocial na modificação do eu" e "O uso da máscara no dia-a-dia: a individualização do social". Conclusão: observou-se a compreensão do uso de máscaras como um recurso para prevenção de uma condição ameaçadora à vida. Atitudes favoráveis parecem se organizar em contraposição ao medo causado pelo vírus e suas consequências.

Objective: to know the social representations of brazilian university students about the use of masks to control COVID-19. Method: qualitative survey, based on the Theory of Social Representations. 283 brazilian university students were selected by convenience. Data were collected through digital form. For analysis, the Thematic Analysis was used. Results: a theme named "The mask for prevention: materialization of the fear of contagion" was elaborated, and three sub-themes, respectively titled "The construction of a new habit: the necessary evil of masks"; "The macrosocial in the modification of the self" and "The use of the mask in everyday life: the individualization of the social". Conclusion: the understanding of the use of masks as a resource for preventing a life-threatening condition was observed. These favorable attitudes seem to be organized in contrast to the fear caused by virus and their consequences.

Objetivo: conocer las representaciones sociales de estudiantes universitarios brasileños sobre el uso de máscaras para el control de COVID-19. Método: estudio cualitativo, basado en la Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales. Participaron 283 universitarios brasileños, seleccionados por conveniencia. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de un formulario digital. Para el análisis se utilizó el Análisis Temático. Resultados: se elaboró un tema denominado "La mascarilla para la prevención: materialización del miedo al contagio" y tres subtemas, respectivamente titulados "La construcción de un nuevo hábito: el mal necesario de las máscaras"; "Lo macrosocial en la modificación del yo" y "El uso de la mascarilla en la vida cotidiana: la individualización de lo social". Conclusión: se observó la comprensión del uso de máscaras como recurso para la prevención de una condición potencialmente mortal. Estas actitudes favorables parecen organizarse en contraste con el miedo provocado por el virus y sus consecuencias.

Human behaviour, NPI and mobility reduction effects on COVID-19 transmission in different countries of the world.

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of Coronavirus disease, which originated in Wuhan, China in 2019, has affected the lives of billions of people globally. Throughout 2020, the reproduction number of COVID-19 was widely used by decision-makers to explain their strategies to control the pandemic. METHODS: In this work, we deduce and analyze both initial and effective reproduction numbers for 12 diverse world regions between February and December of 2020. We consider mobility reductions, mask wearing and compliance with masks, mask efficacy values alongside other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in each region to get further insights in how each of the above factored into each region's SARS-COV-2 transmission dynamic. RESULTS: We quantify in each region the following reductions in the observed effective reproduction numbers of the pandemic: i) reduction due to decrease in mobility (as captured in Google mobility reports); ii) reduction due to mask wearing and mask compliance; iii) reduction due to other NPI's, over and above the ones identified in i) and ii). CONCLUSION: In most cases mobility reduction coming from nationwide lockdown measures has helped stave off the initial wave in countries who took these types of measures. Beyond the first waves, mask mandates and compliance, together with social-distancing measures (which we refer to as other NPI's) have allowed some control of subsequent disease spread. The methodology we propose here is novel and can be applied to other respiratory diseases such as influenza or RSV.

Revisión rápida del uso de cubrebocas quirúrgicos en ámbito comunitario e infecciones respiratorias agudas / Rapid review of the community-wide use of surgical masks and acute respiratory infections

Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad del uso de cubrebocas quirúrgico en ámbitos comunitarios para reducir la probabilidad de contagio por SARS-CoV-2 u otra infección respiratoria aguda viral, en comparación con no usar cubrebocas. Material y métodos: Se utilizó la metodología de revisiones rápidas de Cochrane. La estrategia de búsqueda abarcó una base de datos académica y pre-prints hasta el 1 de abril de 2020. Los títulos y resúmenes fueron revisados por un investigador. La revisión de textos completos fue dividida entre tres investigadores. Los resultados fueron sintetizados de forma narrativa. Resultados: Se identificaron 713 manuscritos, de los cuales 21 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. De seis revisiones sistemáticas, cuatro no encontraron reducciones en la probabilidad de contagio y seis estudios experimentales en hogares no encontraron diferencias en la probabilidad de contagio asociado con el uso de cubrebocas. Únicamente un estudio de modelaje estimó una reducción de 20% en la incidencia de enfermedad respiratoria, asumiendo que 10 a 50% de la población hace uso correcto de cubrebocas quirúrgicos. Conclusiones: La evidencia científica no es concluyente para recomendar o desalentar el uso de cubrebocas a nivel poblacional. Considerando los potenciales efectos negativos, las recomendaciones gubernamentales deberían esperar a los resultados de los experimentos naturales en países que han recomendado la utilización poblacional de cubrebocas.

Abstract: Objective: To assess the effectiveness of using surgical masks in community settings to reduce the probability of infection by SARS-CoV-2 or other acute viral respiratory infection, compared to not using surgical masks. Materials and methods: We followed the Cochrane rapid review methodology. The search strategy encompasses one academic database and pre-prints until April 1, 2020. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by one investigator. The full text review was divided among three researchers. The results were synthesized in a narrative way. Result: 713 manuscripts were identified, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. Of six systematic reviews, four found no reduction in the probability of transmission. Experimental home studies found no differences in the probability of contagion associated with the use of mouth masks. Only one modeling study estimated a 20% reduction in the incidence of acute respiratory disease, assuming that 10 to 50% of the population use the surgical masks correctly. Conclusions: The scientific evidence is inconclusive to recommend or discourage the use of surgical masks at the population level. Considering the potential negative effects, official recommendations should await for the results of natural experiments currently occurring in countries that have recommended the use of face masks at the population level.

Knowledge, attitude and practice of wearing mask in the population presenting to tertiary hospitals in a developing country.

BACKGROUND: In the era of COVID-19 where there is emphasis on the importance of wearing a mask, wearing it rightly is equally important. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of wearing a mask in the general population of a developing country at three major tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants of this cross-sectional study were patients and attendants at three major tertiary care hospital of Karachi Pakistan. Selected participants, through non-probability convenient sampling technique, were interviewed regarding knowledge, attitude, and practice of wearing mask using an Urdu translated version of a questionnaire used in an earlier study. Three summary scores (0 to 100) were computed to indicate participants' mask wearing practice, technique of putting it on, and technique of taking if off. Collected data were analyzed with the help of IBM SPSS version 19. RESULTS: A total of 370 selected individuals were interviewed, out of which 51.9% were male and mean age was 37.65±11.94 years. For more than 90% of the participants, wearing a face mask was a routine practicing during the pandemic. The mean practice score was 65.69±25.51, score for technique of putting on a face mask was 67.77±23.03, and score of technique of taking off a face mask was 51.01±29.23. Education level of participant tends to have positive relationship with all three scores, while presence of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as co-morbid had negative impact on mask wearing practice. CONCLUSION: We have observed suboptimal knowledge, attitude and practice of wearing mask among the selected individuals. There is a continued need to spread awareness and educate general population about the importance of using a face mask, as well as the proper technique of wearing and taking off a face mask.

The Burden of Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Cases, Hospitalizations, and Mortality Based on Vaccination Status and Mandated Mask Use: Statewide Data From Wisconsin and Narrative Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases continue to surge in the United States with the emergence of new variants. Statewide variability and inconsistency in implementing risk mitigation strategies are widespread, particularly in regards to enforcing mask mandates and encouraging the public to become fully vaccinated. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted on July 31, 2021, utilizing publicly available data from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services. The authors abstracted data on total COVID-19-related cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in the state of Wisconsin. The primary objective was comparison of total COVID-19-related cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in vaccinated versus unvaccinated people in the state of Wisconsin over a 31-day period (July 2021). Furthermore, we also performed a narrative review of the literature on COVID-19-related outcomes based on mask use and vaccination status. RESULTS: In the state of Wisconsin during July 2021, total COVID-19 cases was 125.4 per 100,000 fully vaccinated people versus 369.2 per 100,000 not fully vaccinated people (odds ratio [OR] = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.35; P < .001). Total COVID-19 hospitalizations was 4.9 per 100,000 fully vaccinated people versus 18.2 per 100,000 not fully vaccinated people (OR = 0.27, 98% CI, 0.22-0.32; P < .001). Total COVID-19 deaths was 0.1 per 100,000 fully vaccinated people versus 1.1 per 100,000 not fully vaccinated people (OR = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.03-0.29; P < .001). Narrative review of the literature demonstrated high vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection prevention (79%-100% among fully vaccinated people), COVID-19-related hospitalization (87%-98% among fully vaccinated people), and COVID-19-related death (96.7%-98% among fully vaccinated people). Studies have also generally reported that mask use was associated with increased effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 infection ≤70%. CONCLUSIONS: Strict adherence to public mask use and fully vaccinated status are associated with improved COVID-19-related outcomes and can mitigate the spread, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19. Anesthesiologists and intensivists should adhere to evidence-based guidelines in their approach and management of patients to help mitigate spread.

How social distancing, mobility, and preventive policies affect COVID-19 outcomes: Big data-driven evidence from the District of Columbia-Maryland-Virginia (DMV) megaregion.

Many factors play a role in outcomes of an emerging highly contagious disease such as COVID-19. Identification and better understanding of these factors are critical in planning and implementation of effective response strategies during such public health crises. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of factors related to social distancing, human mobility, enforcement strategies, hospital capacity, and testing capacity on COVID-19 outcomes within counties located in District of Columbia as well as the states of Maryland and Virginia. Longitudinal data have been used in the analysis to model county-level COVID-19 infection and mortality rates. These data include big location-based service data, which were collected from anonymized mobile devices and characterize various social distancing and human mobility measures within the study area during the pandemic. The results provide empirical evidence that lower rates of COVID-19 infection and mortality are linked with increased levels of social distancing and reduced levels of travel-particularly by public transit modes. Other preventive strategies and polices also prove to be influential in COVID-19 outcomes. Most notably, lower COVID-19 infection and mortality rates are linked with stricter enforcement policies and more severe penalties for violating stay-at-home orders. Further, policies that allow gradual relaxation of social distancing measures and travel restrictions as well as those requiring usage of a face mask are related to lower rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths. Additionally, increased access to ventilators and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds, which represent hospital capacity, are linked with lower COVID-19 mortality rates. On the other hand, gaps in testing capacity are related to higher rates of COVID-19 infection. The results also provide empirical evidence for reports suggesting that certain minority groups such as African Americans and Hispanics are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Association of Child Masking With COVID-19-Related Closures in US Childcare Programs.

Importance: It is not known how effective child masking is in childcare settings in preventing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. This question is critical to inform health policy and safe childcare practices. Objective: To assess the association between masking children 2 years and older and subsequent childcare closure because of COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, 1-year, longitudinal electronic survey study of 6654 childcare professionals at home- and center-based childcare programs in all 50 states was conducted at baseline (May 22 to June 8, 2020) and follow-up (May 26 to June 23, 2021). Using a generalized linear model (log-binomial model) with robust SEs, this study evaluated the association between childcare program closure because of a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 case in either children or staff during the study period and child masking in both early adoption (endorsed at baseline) and continued masking (endorsed at baseline and follow-up), while controlling for physical distancing, other risk mitigation strategies, and program and community characteristics. Exposures: Child masking in childcare programs as reported by childcare professionals at baseline and both baseline and follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: Childcare program closure because of a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 case in either children or staff as reported in the May 26 to June 23, 2021, end survey. Results: This survey study of 6654 childcare professionals (mean [SD] age, 46.9 [11.3] years; 750 [11.3%] were African American, 57 [0.9%] American Indian/Alaska Native, 158 [2.4%] Asian, 860 [12.9%] Hispanic, 135 [2.0%] multiracial [anyone who selected >1 race on the survey], 18 [0.3%] Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 5020 [75.4%] White) found that early adoption (baseline) of child masking was associated with a 13% lower risk of childcare program closure because of a COVID-19 case (adjusted relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99), and continued masking for 1 year was associated with a 14% lower risk (adjusted relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.00). Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study of childcare professionals suggests that masking young children is associated with fewer childcare program closures, enabling in-person education. This finding has important public health policy implications for families that rely on childcare to sustain employment.

Increased mask adherence after important politician infected with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify changes in adherence to mask and distancing guidelines in outdoor settings in Philadelphia, PA before and after President Trump announced he was infected with COVID-19. METHODS: We used Systematic Observation of Masking Adherence and Distancing (SOMAD) to assess mask adherence in parks, playgrounds, and commercial streets in the 10 City Council districts in Philadelphia PA. We compared adherence rates between August and September 2020 and after October 2, 2020. RESULTS: Disparities in mask adherence existed by age group, gender, and race/ethnicity, with females wearing masks correctly more often than males, seniors having higher mask use than other age groups, and Asians having higher adherence than other race/ethnicities. Correct mask use did not increase after the City released additional mask guidance in September but did after Oct 2. Incorrect mask use also decreased, but the percentage not having masks at all was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerability of leadership appears to influence population behavior. Public health departments likely need more resources to effectively and persuasively communicate critical safety messages related to COVID-19 transmission.

Healthcare institutions' recommendation regarding the use of FFP-2 masks and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among healthcare workers: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCW) are heavily exposed to SARS-CoV-2 from the beginning of the pandemic. We aimed to analyze risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion among HCW with a special emphasis on the respective healthcare institutions' recommendation regarding the use of FFP-2 masks. METHODS: We recruited HCW from 13 health care institutions (HCI) with different mask policies (type IIR surgical face masks vs. FFP-2 masks) in Southeastern Switzerland (canton of Grisons). Sera of participants were analyzed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies 6 months apart, after the first and during the second pandemic wave using an electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA, Roche Diagnostics). We captured risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection by using an online questionnaire at both time points. The effects of individual COVID-19 exposure, regional incidence and FFP-2 mask policy on the probability of seroconversion were evaluated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 99 of 2794 (3.5%) HCW at baseline and in 376 of 2315 (16.2%) participants 6 months later. In multivariable analyses the strongest association for seroconversion was exposure to a household member with known COVID-19 (aOR: 19.82, 95% CI 8.11-48.43, p < 0.001 at baseline and aOR: 8.68, 95% CI 6.13-12.29, p < 0.001 at follow-up). Significant occupational risk factors at baseline included exposure to COVID-19 patients (aOR: 2.79, 95% CI 1.28-6.09, p = 0.010) and to SARS-CoV-2 infected co-workers (aOR: 2.50, 95% CI 1.52-4.12, p < 0.001). At follow up 6 months later, non-occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI 1.66-3.89 p < 0.001) and the local COVID-19 incidence of the corresponding HCI (aOR: 1.98, 95% CI 1.30-3.02, p = 0.001) were associated with seroconversion. The healthcare institutions' mask policy (surgical masks during usual exposure vs. general use of FFP-2 masks) did not affect seroconversion rates of HCW during the first and the second pandemic wave. CONCLUSION: Contact with SARS-CoV-2 infected household members was the most important risk factor for seroconversion among HCW. The strongest occupational risk factor was exposure to COVID-19 patients. During this pandemic, with heavy non-occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2, the mask policy of HCIs did not affect the seroconversion rate of HCWs.

Rhinovirus Incidence Rates Indicate We Are Tired of Non-pharmacological Interventions Against Coronavirus Disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the incidence of rhinovirus (RV) is inversely related to the intensity of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs), such as universal mask wearing and physical distancing. METHODS: Using RV surveillance data, changes in the effect of NPIs were investigated in South Korea during the pandemic. The time to the first visible effect of NPIs after the onset of NPIs (T1), time to the maximum effect (T2), and duration of the maximum effect (T3) were measured for each surge. For each week, the RVdiff [(RV incidence during the pandemic) - (RV incidence within 5 years before the pandemic)] was calculated, and number of weeks for RVdiff to be below zero after NPIs (time to RVdiff ≤ 0) and number of weeks RVdiff remains below zero after NPIs (duration of RVdiff ≤ 0) were measured for each surge. RESULTS: During the study period, four surges of COVID-19 were reported. As the pandemic progressed, T1 and T2 increased, but T3 decreased. Additionally, the "time to RVdiff of ≤ 0" increased and "duration of RVdiff of ≤ 0" decreased. These changes became more pronounced during the third surge (mid-November 2020), before the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine, and from the emergence of the delta variant. CONCLUSION: The effect of NPIs appears slower, the duration of the effect becomes shorter, and the intensity also decreases less than a year after the onset of the pandemic owing to people's exhaustion in implementing NPIs. These findings suggest that the COVID-19 response strategy must be completely overhauled.

Masking for School-Age Children With Epilepsy: We Do Have Consensus!

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to assess current recommendations from child neurologists and epileptologists on masking for school-age children with epilepsy. METHODS: A 7-item survey was created and sent out to members of the Child Neurology Society and Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium in August of 2021 to assess current practice and provider recommendations on masking. RESULTS: One hundred four individuals participated with representation from all regions of the United States. Masking was recommended by 95.1%, with 63.4% (n = 66) noting exception of those with severe intellectual disability, autism, and behavioral problems. Of those who write exemption letters, 54% write these <5% of the time. Only 3% reported potential adverse events associated with masking. CONCLUSION: Nearly all respondents recommended masking for school-age children with epilepsy. Potential risks of masking and adverse events were low. Improved guidance on masking is needed to ensure academic success of our patients with epilepsy.

Discrepancy of particle passage in 101 mask batches during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany.

During the first wave of Covid-19 infections in Germany in April 2020, clinics reported a shortage of filtering face masks with aerosol retention> 94% (FFP2 & 3, KN95, N95). Companies all over the world increased their production capacities, but quality control of once-certified materials and masks came up short. To help identify falsely labeled masks and ensure safe protection equipment, we tested 101 different batches of masks in 993 measurements with a self-made setup based on DIN standards. An aerosol generator provided a NaCl test aerosol which was applied to the mask. A laser aerosol spectrometer measured the aerosol concentration in a range from 90 to 500 nm to quantify the masks' retention. Of 101 tested mask batches, only 31 batches kept what their label promised. Especially in the initial phase of the pandemic in Germany, we observed fluctuating mask qualities. Many batches show very high variability in aerosol retention. In addition, by measuring with a laser aerosol spectrometer, we were able to show that not all masks filter small and large particles equally well. In this study we demonstrate how important internal and independent quality controls are, especially in times of need and shortage of personal protection equipment.

Pandemia da COVID-19: adaptação e avaliação psicométrica da "Face Mask Use Scale" / Pandemia de COVID-19: adaptación y evaluación psicométrica de la Face Mask Use Scale / COVID-19 pandemic: adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Face Mask Use Scale

Resumo Objetivo Adaptar culturalmente para o português do Brasil a Face Mask Use Scale e avaliar suas propriedades psicométricas. Métodos Estudo metodológico, transversal, com abordagem quantitativa, que compreendeu as etapas de: tradução; consenso da versão em português; avaliação por comitê de especialistas; retrotradução e comparação com a versão original; teste piloto e avaliação psicométrica da Face Mask Use Scale (FMUS). Resultados A versão original da FMUS foi traduzida para o português do Brasil. A validade de conteúdo foi realizada por um painel de cinco especialistas. O índice de validade de conteúdo para a escala (IVC-S/Ave) foi 0,87 e para os itens (IVC-I) variou de 0,6 a 1,0. A versão para o português do Brasil da FMUS (FMUS-PB) foi aplicada em 4822 adultos com idade média de 30 anos (DP = 11,7). Na consistência interna, o Alfa de Cronbach foi de 0,86. O modelo original de dois fatores da FMUS não se mostrou adequado para a população brasileira pelo uso da análise fatorial confirmatória e exploratória. Assim, realizou-se uma análise fatorial exploratória para investigar a estrutura fatorial da FMUS-PB novamente e um novo modelo potencial da FMUS-PB para melhor explicação. A FMUS-PB apresentou estrutura fatorial diferente do modelo original. Os itens foram alinhados em um único fator, criando um instrumento unidimensional que explicou 59,7% da variância total. A validade de construto por grupos conhecidos foi satisfatória (p <0,001). Conclusão A FMUS-PB é confiável e válida para medir a prática do uso de máscaras entre a população brasileira, sobretudo na pandemia da COVID-19.

Resumen Objetivo Adaptar culturalmente la Face Mask Use Scale al portugués de Brasil y evaluar sus propiedades psicométricas. Métodos Estudio metodológico, transversal, con enfoque cualitativo, que comprendió las siguientes etapas: traducción, consenso de la versión en portugués, evaluación de comité de especialistas, retrotraducción y comparación con la versión original, prueba piloto y evaluación psicométrica de la Face Mask Use Scale (FMUS). Resultados La versión original de la FMUS fue traducida al portugués de Brasil. La validez de contenido fue realizada por un panel de cinco especialistas. El índice de validez de contenido de la escala (IVC-S/Ave) fue 0,87 y el de los ítems (IVC-I) varió de 0,6 a 1,0. La versión en portugués de Brasil de la FMUS (FMUS-PB) fue aplicada a 4.822 adultos de edad promedio de 30 años (DP = 11,7). En la consistencia interna, el Alfa de Cronbach fue de 0,86. El modelo original de dos factores de la FMUS demostró no ser adecuado para la población brasileña mediante el uso del análisis factorial confirmatorio y exploratorio. De esta forma, se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio para investigar la estructura factorial de la FMUS-PB nuevamente y un nuevo modelo posible de la FMUS-PB para una mejor explicación. La FMUS-PB presentó una estructura factorial diferente al modelo original. Los ítems fueron alineados en un único factor y se creó un instrumento unidimensional que explicó el 59,7 % de la varianza total. La validez del constructo por grupos conocidos fue satisfactoria (p < 0,001). Conclusión La FMUS-PB es confiable y válida para medir la práctica del uso de mascarillas en la población brasileña, sobre todo durante la pandemia de COVID-19.

Abstract Objective To culturally adapt the Face Mask Use Scale to Brazilian Portuguese and assess its psychometric properties. Methods This is a methodological, cross-sectional, quantitative study, which comprised the following steps: translation; Portuguese version consensus; assessment by an expert committee; back-translation and comparison with the original version; pilot test; and psychometric assessment of the Face Mask Use Scale (FMUS). Results The original version of FMUS was translated into Brazilian Portuguese. Content validity was performed by a panel of five experts.The Content Validity Index for the scale (CVI-S/Ave) was 0.87 and for the items (CVI-I) it ranged from 0.6 to 1.0. The FMUS - Brazilian Portuguese version (FMUS-BP) was applied to 4822 adults with a mean age of 30 years (SD = 11.7).For internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was 0.86. The original two-factor model of the FMUS was not suitable for the Brazilian population due to the use of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Thus, an Exploratory Factor Analysis was carried out to investigate the factor structure of the FMUS-BP again and a new potential model of the FMUS-BP for better explanation.The FMUS-BP presented a factor structure different from the original model. Items were aligned on a single factor, creating a one-dimensional instrument that explained 59.7% of the total variance. Construct validity by known-groups was satisfactory (p <0.001). Conclusion The FMUS-BP is reliable and valid to measure the practice of using masks among the Brazilian population, especially in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Estimating the impact of interventions against COVID-19: From lockdown to vaccination.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease of humans caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the first case was identified in China in December 2019 the disease has spread worldwide, leading to an ongoing pandemic. In this article, we present an agent-based model of COVID-19 in Luxembourg, and use it to estimate the impact, on cases and deaths, of interventions including testing, contact tracing, lockdown, curfew and vaccination. Our model is based on collation, with agents performing activities and moving between locations accordingly. The model is highly heterogeneous, featuring spatial clustering, over 2000 behavioural types and a 10 minute time resolution. The model is validated against COVID-19 clinical monitoring data collected in Luxembourg in 2020. Our model predicts far fewer cases and deaths than the equivalent equation-based SEIR model. In particular, with R0 = 2.45, the SEIR model infects 87% of the resident population while our agent-based model infects only around 23% of the resident population. Our simulations suggest that testing and contract tracing reduce cases substantially, but are less effective at reducing deaths. Lockdowns are very effective although costly, while the impact of an 11pm-6am curfew is relatively small. When vaccinating against a future outbreak, our results suggest that herd immunity can be achieved at relatively low coverage, with substantial levels of protection achieved with only 30% of the population fully immune. When vaccinating in the midst of an outbreak, the challenge is more difficult. In this context, we investigate the impact of vaccine efficacy, capacity, hesitancy and strategy. We conclude that, short of a permanent lockdown, vaccination is by far the most effective way to suppress and ultimately control the spread of COVID-19.